Abstract article references

ClauseBase allows you to easily create automatic cross-references to other parts of your document. However, there are a few situations when you want to refer in an abstract way to an “article” or “section” of your document. Examples:

The buyer shall buy the assets in the manner set forth in the articles above.

or

The articles of this contract shall be construed in accordance with …

You may be tempted to hard-code the word “articles” here. However, this may impede reusability, as some lawyers will want to use the word “section”, “paragraph”, or perhaps an abbreviation such as “art.”, or perhaps a word that always has a starting capital.

ClauseBase allows you to instead use a special expression, that will output in accordance with the styling settings found under “References”.

The special expression essentially consists of the word “article” (for singular) or “articles” (for plural), but actually depends on the language:

LanguageSingularPlural
Bulgarian__клауза___клаузи_
Czech_bod__body_
Danish_klausul__klausuler_
Dutch_artikel__artikels_
English_article__articles_
Estonian_klausel__klauslid_
Finnish_lauseke__lausekkeet_
French_article__articles_
German_artikel__artikeln_
Hungarian_záradék__záradékok_
Italian_clausola__clausole_
Latvian_klauzula__klauzulas_
Lithuanian_straipsnis__straipsniai_
Norwegian_klausulen__klausulene_
Polish_klauzula__klauzule_
Portuguese_cláusula__cláusulas_
Romanian_clauza__clauzele_
Russian_пункт__пункты_
Slovak_doložka__doložky_
Slovenian_klavzula__klavzuli_
Spanish_cláusula__cláusulas_
Swedish_klausul__klausulerna_

By default, the word will be outputted with a defined article (no pun intended), but this can be modulated in the same way as concepts. For example, for English, assuming the styling setting is set to “Section”:

  • default: _article_ is outputted as “the section”, while _articles_ is outputted as “the sections”
  • omitting: _-article_ is outputted as “section”, while _-articles_ is outputted as “sections”
  • undefined: _?article_ is outputted as “a section”, while _?articles°_ is outputted as “sections”
  • this: _°article_ is outputted as “this section”, while _°articles_ is outputted as “these sections”

For the sake of consistency or clarity, you can also use _+article_ or _+articles_, but it will have exactly the same output as the default _article_ / _articles_.

Caveat

The _article_ expression can be useful in a few very specific circumstances. However, its use cases are actually fairly limited:

  • Please do not use it to hard-code references to other parts of your document — e.g. when you would be tempted to write ... as set forth in _-article_ 13.5 to refer to some article 13.5 in your document, you will almost certainly want to use real cross-references instead.
  • Please do not use it to refer to articles/sections/clauses of external material, such as legislation, as the word that will be outputted will then change in accordance with a user’s styling preferences.

    For example, European Directives and Regulations are typically numbered as “articles”. If you need to refer to the part of the EU General Data Protection Regulation that lists all the definition, please do not say ... as defined in _-article 4_ of the GPDR ..., as this could get outputted as “… as defined in Section 4 of the GDPR”, depending on a user’s styling preferences. This is one of the few areas where you really need to hard-code your reference, by simply stating .... as defined in article 4 of the GDPR...
Was this article helpful?
Dislike
Clause versioning